EVE Search - Tora Bushido

All Channels

CSM Campaigns

Tora Bushido - CSM X

» Click here to find additional results for this topic using Google

Monitor this thread via RSS [?]

Author	Thread Statistics \| Show CCP posts - 0 post(s)
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1435	Posted - 2014.12.01 13:54:44 - [1] - Quote Just noticed the campaigns have already started. Will write a nice long post this weekend who I am, why vote for me, what I can do for you and what not. In the mean time, read the great player profile Feyd made : http://evedarklord.blogspot.nl/2014/11/tora-bushido-player-profile.html DISCLAIMER : All of the above replies are not meant as any form of harassment. It's all SciFi. YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1435	Posted - 2014.12.01 13:55:01 - [2] - Quote Reserved DISCLAIMER : All of the above replies are not meant as any form of harassment. It's all SciFi. YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1446	Posted - 2014.12.02 00:10:06 - [3] - Quote Thanks Sabriz. Tengu : Right now I am collecting questions on high-sec and on the user interface. As they will be my prio's. This weekend I'll start writing a long post with questions and answers. Including yours. @All : As CSM my Engrish will stay the same. This is to support the rest of the non native English speakers. I want to find solutions for the entire high-sec community. Not just the "bad" or "Good" guys. TORA FOR CSM X YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1449	Posted - 2014.12.02 07:52:42 - [4] - Quote Tengu Grib wrote: [quote=Tora Bushido]Thanks Tora! In that case, would it be easier for you if I posted another thing here, or send you a mail? Both would work. I have made myself a list with questions people have and suggestions how they think we can improve it. @Lanctharus Onzo : That would be nice, but give me a week or so. I need top get things properly on paper first. I always think before I speak. And I listen to your podcast all the time, so I knew you were TORA FOR CSM X YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1464	Posted - 2014.12.03 14:10:22 - [5] - Quote Tear Jar wrote: It seems a lot of people join corps even when it isn't in their best interest. What is your opinion on a "social only" corp being implemented into eve(no pocos, hangers or poses, but can't be wardecced)? EDIT : I used your idea and added some changes. See main post. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1473	Posted - 2014.12.03 17:45:58 - [6] - Quote Black Pedro wrote: Well, several of these are just straight up nerfs to ganking........ Otherwise, a 30 minute lockout where I all I can do is just sit in space in a pod is not very compelling gameplay. Finally, ganking is at an all time low yet suppose to be in the game. Do you really, really think that more nerfs are in order? Yes, they are. But that's much better then no ganking at all in high-sec You need to see this not only from a ganker point, but also from the ganked player. It doesn't really matter how you call the timer, as long as you are killable without the easy dockup option. 30 minutes might be a bit to much. 15-20min or so might be better. Quote: How would you feel if you had to go AFK because one of your kids acted up/got hurt/whatever, and you came back to find yourself under attack, tried to defend yourself/warp off, only to die because your keystroke(s) were consumed by a stupid modal dialog? You should have docked up and ban the people who script. Quote: It would actually be better to do what some other games do, and either publicly flag people as AFK (Star Trek Online) or just warn them a few minutes before logging them off (Elder Scrolls Online). I dont agree. Flagging is something different then what I want. I want people to be behind their pc when they are logged in. A notification a few minutes before you return to the login screen, of course that should be there. Quote: Re: different ways of supporting social communities in EVE, have you read any of Mangala Solaris' suggestions along those lines? e.g., http://crossingzebras.com/social-change/ and https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=355810 I haven't, but will do. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1474	Posted - 2014.12.03 18:42:46 - [7] - Quote Dersen Lowery wrote: Sorry, but if my kid's in trouble, I'm not going to do a damn thing in the game first. Same here, but then again, I wouldn't cry about a lose or any game mechanic when I get shot when that happens. You already have the same 'problem' now in Eve. Some click-able button won't make a difference. Quote: Do I want to play that game ? Yes. To long AFK while logged on in Eve is bad. We all have small things while we do while we play (bio, wife agro, need a beer, door bells, phones, etc), but if they take to much time >>> Auto Log Off. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1476	Posted - 2014.12.03 19:42:53 - [8] - Quote Quote: increase the interaction with those that oppose ganking Anything that will increase the interaction between gankers and anti-gankers is something I will support. Blue loot would be ok too. I mainly have an issue with freighter ganking right now. It's way to hard to protect yourself from it. Even if a freighter hires Marmites to camp the entire system, escort if from A to B, it's still easy to gank it. Mining barges can at least be pvp fitted as bait, align, etc. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1476	Posted - 2014.12.03 19:50:41 - [9] - Quote Meilandra Vanderganken wrote: Then maybe the randoms should set up dedicated camps instead of having ppl undock forcibly? I think this has about zero chance of ever making it into the game though, I just can't see CCP forcing players to undock. AFK'ing: ppl can AFK what they want as far as I'm concerned, it should be the players providing consequences to others being AFK, not the game. Undeccable corporations and remove NPC? Meh, that's substituting one crappy mechanic with another crappy mechanic. "Don't nerf EVE to death". Well, it seems to me that is pretty much what you are advocating sir Tora. Dedicated camps against NPC gankers, good luck. CCP can do anything, even if they have to make you walk your Fedo every day. I am against things as AFK mining or AFK cloaking in nulsec. Good luck doing something about AFK cloakers. The biggest diff between NPC and 'my' way, is that people can start to learn how corps work and group up. The community thing is what makes Eve such a great game. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1476	Posted - 2014.12.03 19:55:51 - [10] - Quote Remember, I am not going to run for CSM X for just the Tora Ideas. I want to listen to all sides and find common grounds. If I would just listen to one side, the game would be unbalanced and people will leave this great game. I want content in Eve, fun interaction, tears and profit, keep all old players, get more new players, etc. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1479	Posted - 2014.12.03 21:19:08 - [11] - Quote Your thoughts about a 1 minute timer for people who steal loot ? So they cant dock up right away. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1486	Posted - 2014.12.03 22:07:37 - [12] - Quote Meilandra Vanderganken wrote: Tora Bushido wrote: Your thoughts about a 1 minute timer for people who steal loot ? So they cant dock up right away. Hell, why not let them have 15 minute auto-eject from station timer too? Maybe you should stop crying about how bad things are in Eve and start coming with solutions ? It easy to shout from the sideline, much harder to be constructive. As I said before, being a CSM isnt about having all the answers to Eve problems. It's listening to good idea's from the community, finding common grounds, filtering the "Ohhh everything is so badddd" cries, ignoring the trolls and trying to make things better in Eve for all of us. TLDR : Stop Whining, start being constructive. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1492	Posted - 2014.12.04 16:04:31 - [13] - Quote Justin Zaine wrote: Contrary to what someone else has said, anybody that supports the idea of content generation and competetive gameplay in HS should NOT vote for Tora. I am not sure if the industrials in High-sec or any sec would agree with you. It seems its mainly CODE not willing to meet half way. You know there are CSM's that want to completely remove ganking high-sec ? Take your pick which one you want. 100% gone or nerfed. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1493	Posted - 2014.12.04 22:58:06 - [14] - Quote Toriessian wrote: Tora what is your opinion on the different proposals that have been floated over time that have suggested incentives for the defender in war decs to mount an actual defense? It seems a common complaint is that defenders in war decs don't have any reason to really defend leading to a decrease in overall PVP. What would be your take on an incentive if in favor? I am against it, as a small corp or alliance would never ever be able to defend against a large null-sec alliance any more. And if you do it, then you need to do it in low and null too, where you also have NPC stations. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1493	Posted - 2014.12.05 08:45:26 - [15] - Quote Abla Tive wrote: Tora: Despite all the smoke and heat being generated over gankers and war-decs, there is much more going on in hi-sec. CCP has revealed that there are many EVE players (such as myself) who have no interest in tears (either given or received). These players are a non-trivial part of the player base. What are the best ideas you have heard about improving their gaming experience? The best idea I have is to start talking to people who feel this way. Why would I make up solutions, if I haven't even talked to the players who see it as a problem. This answer you will get from me for a lot of issues in Eve. A CSM should talk to people, listen to them, get things back to basics, see how the rest of Eve things about it and if not, why not, communicate this with the players who see curtain things as an issue and then find common grounds we can all agree upon. TLDR : A good CSM talks to people. @Valkin Mordirc : You dont have to create a social club, just because of the numbers in corp. Its a choice you make. Just as you can make a choice now to be in an NPC corp. And I think they wont break down, because they will have no wars, just as the current NPC players. So there is almost no difference between them. Biggest plus here is, you can start forming a corp, get used to corp mechanisms, etc, without worrying about war decs. These will probably be the same players who are in a NPC corp now. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1493	Posted - 2014.12.05 09:23:31 - [16] - Quote Saeger1737 wrote: Still no, we need a content creator, not a merc blue donut maker. We need someone has PvP experience, not t3 blob gang with neutral logi alts. We don't need a mermaid/coward for csm. Stay on topic. If it's attention you seek, let me know and I will send you a postcard. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1494	Posted - 2014.12.05 10:46:59 - [17] - Quote Beatrix Dacella wrote: So to put Abla's question a different way: What are top 3 most important issues you personally see regarding PVE/Incursions/Missioning in hi-sec that you feel should be tackled? Any rough idea or direction you would take to make these aspects of the game better are a bonus. I am not a PvE player, so I cant answer that question. What do you think are the top 3 issues ? TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1494	Posted - 2014.12.05 11:07:54 - [18] - Quote Black Pedro wrote: Players AFK because there is very little risk. Since also players seem to really not like losing their stuff to another player, I suggest a new rare NPC-based mechanism for risk be added to the game. These will be new sleeper NPCs that appear very infrequently across known space, spawning on gates, stations and belts/anomalies at a frequency that is low enough that players will run into them only rarely (1/100 hours in space?) but not never. The first spawn will just be a frigate that double webs the nearest ship and begins to apply a very small amount of damage. A few minutes later (time can be tuned as desired), it will call in a sleeper cruiser, and a few minutes after that a battleship that will be able to apply enough damage to destroy any ship within minutes. I really like this idea. It makes the belts more active, it prevents afk mining, it gives gankers in belts an extra challenge and then there is no need for afk buttons to click. It could also make belts more fun for non miners too. Brain fart : Now if we do this on active gates too, it prevents (ganker / merc / etc) camps staying at one gate/system to long.... TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1494	Posted - 2014.12.05 13:49:27 - [19] - Quote Black Pedro wrote: I doubt it. These NPC aren't suppose to be unkillable so I imagine an organized gate camp will have no problem dispatching the webbing frigate. You would still need players to break an organized gate camp. Plus remember these are suppose to be rare - just a small theoretical risk to make people a little more careful and used to the idea they can lose their stuff if they are AFK. They shouldn't impact normal daily game play much at all. But then they have aggression timers and cant jump. And why make them rare. I rather see them join the fun more often. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1494	Posted - 2014.12.05 17:39:28 - [20] - Quote Tengu Grib wrote: BeBopAReBop RhubarbPie wrote: That module already exists. Its called a microwarpdrive. 10 second align times on freighters would make them absurdly safe. Hmm, allowing freighters to have microwarps... interesting idea. That could certainly work, and the mass bloom would help them resist bumping. 1000MN MW ? TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1495	Posted - 2014.12.05 17:48:38 - [21] - Quote A New High-Sec will be created soon my friends. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1515	Posted - 2014.12.07 18:05:14 - [22] - Quote Don Purple wrote: Dear Tora, I have to say I agree with and like a lot of things here. I believe your ideas on ganking are somewhat scewed. Simply increasing punishment on the ganker does not help the person who just lost possibly everything to their name. I understand being able to gank is better than nothing but how about changes to help the newbro. Essentially increasing the time between ganks doesnt help the dead. Killing an empty pod a station spit out wouldnt remove the taste of loss from my mouth. Increasing war dec prices may lower the ammount of wars but this may also hurt that highsec group wanting to fight their rivals or fresh merc groups and so on. You have been my alliance leader a few times now and a reliable friend, you are a smart man. I agree with your goals but addressing them in a balanced way is the hard part. If anything I wrote is outdated I apologise. I went over your campaign a few days ago. Amy Don Purple idea is good, you should run for CSM I have no problems with my ideas not being the best around and am always willing to listen to better ideas. In the end we all want a better Eve. Which way we get there is up to all players in Eve, not just a small group. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1515	Posted - 2014.12.07 18:06:02 - [23] - Quote Brain fart : An Autopsy Skill that gives you a chance of recovering implants from corpses. yes/no, why ? TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1521	Posted - 2014.12.08 08:39:52 - [24] - Quote Raziel Walker wrote: The Marmite name makes everyone look for the hidden agenda. I won't vote for Tora simply because of his stance against afk cloaking. AFK cloakers are an annoyance but the only thing I think of is me being trapped in a dead-end system unable to jump out because there is a gatecamp and unable to log off because hostiles have probes out. And then I have to set an alarm clock every 20 minutes to prevent losing my ship and implants? I will accept an end to afk cloaking if they will introduce a way to log off safely without getting killed. I knew I took a risk here, as Marmites isnt the most loved alliance in game. But people who know me well, also know that I can set aside my personal issues and go for the bigger picture. I don't see why you can't log off after you timer has run out ? TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1531	Posted - 2014.12.09 18:24:07 - [25] - Quote Vote Tora Bushido, time for a new generation of leaders to step up. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1539	Posted - 2014.12.10 08:21:44 - [26] - Quote Michele Bachmann wrote: Having met Tora at Evesterdam, flown in Marmite Collective on an alt, and being heavily involved with hisec pvp for a reasonable amount of time before my current stint in OE I will unequivocally denounce any sort of run by Tora Bushido for the CSM. While we may agree on a number of issues facing the game I cannot endorse Tora as a worthwhile representative of any player in EVE, especially those he claims to represent the most. He has absolutely no ability to effectively communicate or conduct himself with any sort of respect for his audience or peers. In other words, he is self-involved, selfish, and short sighted. I base this conclusion based upon his behavior during Evesterdam presentations (talking, joking with neighbors, generally not giving the presenter their due respect), and my experience with him as an alliance leader (not encouraging content creativity, a supportive environment to try new things in hisec). TLDR, while his ideas may be appealing I would not want this person representing hisec pvpers to CCP or representing CCP's ideas to the players I'll also say most of his outline in the OP is ill-formed garbage but I'm intentionally avoiding that to focus on the real issue i'm trying to point out. You might have different views on things in Eve and real life and that's ok. The biggest difference between you and me is, I tell people that right away, straight in the face and not on the forums when it suites me. But you're right, making jokes at a great thing as Evesterdam is terribad. And laughing with the entire group about good presentations is also very bad. Having fun with you at the bar, when you accept our beers..... Ahh, well, I think you get the point by now. Very disrespectful to use an event as Evesterdam for your own personal issues. You're probably the last to lecture me about respect. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1542	Posted - 2014.12.10 12:24:33 - [27] - Quote Don Purple wrote: Send Tora a fedo for every vote you plan to give him! -sniped- You found my weak spot. A few thousand Fedo's might stop me from running for CSM. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1542	Posted - 2014.12.10 12:39:16 - [28] - Quote If people vote for me, they will know their Fedo's are safe. Already have a few thousand running around in my HQ (no joke ). TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1545	Posted - 2014.12.10 15:44:40 - [29] - Quote Michele Bachmann wrote: I'm offended at the presumption that I somehow used Evesterdam as some vehicle for a personal vendetta. I observed you acting like an ass, I felt it pertained to your CSM run (of which I had no knowledge of at Evesterdam) and I voiced my opinion. If I were you I'd be telling people how good your interpersonal skills are but seeing that you lack any ability to respond to criticism in any sane manner, that would just be a waste of everyone's time. Are you sure beer was all you had in Amsterdam ? Funny how your opinion is so different then all the other people I spoke too. Personal opinions are ok, but don't go crazy on the fairy tales You are offended....lol TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1547	Posted - 2014.12.10 18:35:13 - [30] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: To be honest, while I've only had contact with you through the game I'd be surprised if Michele's comments are far off. You are pretty self obsessed and not really a people person. It would be half interesting to see you get onto the CSM just to see how long it takes for them to ask you not to show up to meetings. That said, it's probably better for people to stick their votes somewhere they might make a worthy difference. Are we talking about me or yourself Lucas ? If there is someone who enjoys listening to his own long forum posts, It's you mate Do you think I could run Marmites for years if I wasn't a people person? Players who have been there from the start. Do you think I would have good relations with so many alliances all over Eve ? Just because you don't know about these things, doesn't mean they aren't there. You life in your own perfect world, where everyone else is weird, which is ok, but remember it's just your fantasy world. Don't start making up things because it makes you feel better. That's not very nice, is it ? /me waiting for longggg "I am Lucas, I am so great" posts.... TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1550	Posted - 2014.12.11 21:01:37 - [31] - Quote Tora Bushido wrote: /me waiting for longggg "I am Lucas, I am so great" posts.... Damn I am good Vote for Tora, he can predict the future ! TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1552	Posted - 2014.12.12 20:23:53 - [32] - Quote I take CSM more serious then this. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1566	Posted - 2014.12.15 22:47:58 - [33] - Quote Alekseyev Karrde wrote: If Ankesemtapemkah liked to PVP, the campaign thread would probably look like this. Tora just doesn't have to social skills to be an effective CSM. The petty back and forth on this thread is fairly typical of the interactions I've had with him, both working with and against him. We can do better. If you can do it, anyone can. At least my social skills are much better then yours. This Noir. support might just have given me more votes. Thanks for the bump ! <3 TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1568	Posted - 2014.12.16 08:17:16 - [34] - Quote If you look at the last two replies you can see one telling me I will nerf Eve to death and the other one who thinks I will do nothing as it doesn't suite my alliance. Eve is about content and balance. If I think Eve is getting to nerfed, I will bring in more darkness. If it's to dark, shine more light. And to keep this in balance, I talk and listen to people. Even to people I personally do not like. Making decisions as a CSM should not be about feelings, but facts. I have made some strong statements here on this post. Not because that is the fixed direction, but to get some good discussions going on and see how people think about things. After reading the replies, I'll start correcting the direction we move in. No Yin without yang and vice versa. For people who think I will turn high-sec in to a nerfed Wow Disneyland, no worries TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1568	Posted - 2014.12.16 11:54:33 - [35] - Quote Eve is a great game, where you can get daily tears from some predictable players. This is something I will never nerf ! TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1577	Posted - 2014.12.17 08:12:30 - [36] - Quote Alana Charen-Teng wrote: I agree entirely with Sabriz, and am very disappointed in the positions Tora Bushido has taken here. As I said before, my direction has not yet been set in stone. I am using them to see how people think about Eve. I am not here to make Eve as I would like it to see it, I am here to make it as the community wants it to be. So tell me, how would you like Eve to be. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1602	Posted - 2014.12.21 12:49:15 - [37] - Quote Thanks for the advice, but I am the kind of CSM who wont take any bullshit and will speak up if needed. If you prefer someone who just says yes all the time, do not vote for me. Vote for Tora if you want your voice to count. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1603	Posted - 2014.12.22 15:11:19 - [38] - Quote Each area of space has its own challenges. The initial post of Ideas were never a basis for my Campaign, but to act as a spark plug for getting to the down and dirty of these kind of issues. While this approach may have turned the stomachs of manyGÇª If one canGÇÖt identify the down and dirty from the player base, then what good is the CSM. IGÇÖm here to listen and I want more of your ideas! So letGÇÖs get down to business. A few ideas that were send to me. Your thoughts ? FLEET ESCORT - Anyone within a fleet of someone who is unlawfully shot at immediately gains lock against that Criminal. The Immediate Lock doesn't make any sense, but neither does the Criminal ship being held in place, unable to move. This just helps those with any escorts or anti-ganker groups to react quicker in an attempt to defend the Target. THE HIDEOUT GÇô A Mobile Deployable Unit that shadows Criminal Targets from Concord. While of course Criminals will lose their ships, and they canGÇÖt undock in another ship, they could still undock in a Pod and warp to this 15km Area to hide in new ships. The Hideout will also tick down the timer twice as fast while they are in range and in a ship. What this does is provide opportunities for Anti Ganker movements to hunt Gankers who may find this unit useful to quicken their return to another gank. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1606	Posted - 2014.12.23 08:33:33 - [39] - Quote Remember, these are not my ideas, but from people who support me. The main reason I post them here, is to see how the community (dis)likes it. I just collect, sort, check feedback, analyze, filter and use the output for the CSM campaign. The hideout is something I do like myself. It gives both sides new options, its simple and it eliminates the other ideas about timers, kickout of stations, etc. that some had issues with. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1611	Posted - 2014.12.23 19:52:01 - [40] - Quote 1) Why would you nerf something if they are ok with paying the bills for it ? What if someone would have said, limit the number of titans in1 alliance ? Or limit the number of enemies in one null-sec system ? Sounds just as weird to me. 2) Ganking is part of high-sec. Nerfing it would be bad for Eve. And ganking isnt mass murder. 3) I had to buy tags to get back from -10 to above 0. I still feel the isk pain Let's keep them anyway. 4) Why push people to low and null if they want to be in high-sec ? People decide themselves where they want to play. 5) Bounties are a nice extra, but need a LOT of work to be useful. Kill rights are ok if it would be easier to see who has them on who. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1615	Posted - 2014.12.24 13:52:45 - [41] - Quote Abla Tive wrote: Leave the damsel alone! I see your point. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1632	Posted - 2014.12.29 15:30:27 - [42] - Quote Ima Wreckyou wrote: Also I don't think it is your job as a CSM to do game design, but to provide feedback to CCP about their game designs. If you don't even get that you may be the wrong person for the job entirely. I am not doing any game design. I get feedback from the community, like the hideout idea (which I do like) and I post it to see the responses. You responded, thank you. +1 TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1635	Posted - 2014.12.30 09:13:20 - [43] - Quote Danalee wrote: Since you aim to keep EVE from turning into a nerfed Disneyland, what is your opinion on the heavy handed forum administration that's been killing some previously vibrant official sub-forums? If I only could discuss this subject Let's say, I probably agree with almost all other C&P members here about it. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1635	Posted - 2014.12.30 09:43:48 - [44] - Quote The following players I would endorse for CSM X (random order) : * Bobmon * Xander Phoena * Mike Azariah * Corebloodbrothers * Corbexx * Sabriz * Sugar Kyle Tora TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1662	Posted - 2015.01.02 14:06:33 - [45] - Quote Gully Alex Foyle : I wouldnGÇÖt be against removing the faction police, so we would see more players with -5 or lower in high-sec. Interaction between high-sec and any other part of Eve can only be good. It also shows players from high-sec that there is more then just high-sec (where most start in). There are enough players in high-sec to still shoot them, so I donGÇÖt really see the need for the police. Making high-sec stations unaccessible is not something I would support right now, unless someone could convince me why itGÇÖs really good idea. If negative status players could only base in low-sec, wouldnGÇÖt that affect the high-sec players on the edge of high-sec more then the center ? TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1662	Posted - 2015.01.02 15:38:03 - [46] - Quote Brain fart : What would happen if CCP reduced the Jump Fatigue while you traveling in your own sov ? TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1663	Posted - 2015.01.02 19:51:38 - [47] - Quote True, but then you are also taking more risk. And wouldn't it make sense, that when you move in your own sov, it should be easier to move around, then when going to enemy sov ? TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1674	Posted - 2015.01.04 10:44:30 - [48] - Quote Nick Actilete wrote: Marmite collective? Sorry, but no vote from me. I understand Eve is about feelings, but the CSM shouldnt be. We are at war with the CFC for a year now, but I would still vote for one of them if I think they can do a good job. If you think I couldn't do that job, then you re right, don't vote for me. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1693	Posted - 2015.01.07 08:36:52 - [49] - Quote The social corps are a choice. Just because you have less then 10 players, doesn't automatically mean you have to be in a social corp. Want more profit and options, then you've got to take more risk too. Just create a normal corp and setup a pos. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1708	Posted - 2015.01.08 10:18:56 - [50] - Quote Would I ever troll anyone ? TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1710	Posted - 2015.01.09 00:18:27 - [51] - Quote 2a. I do expect you to log off or accept pressing a button. If you're afk, you are not actively playing Eve. If you are active, pressing a button wont kill you. Even if it's just once every 30 min. You want the profit of being cloaked, then work for it. 2b. That would work too. I just want less afk mining. You can do this by punishment or rewarding players. Let's try rewarding for a change. 3. They can already be in NPC corps and hide for ever. There is no difference. Might want those NPC corps to still pay tax ? 5. True, that is a risk. 6. Sounds fun too. There are many ways to get to the same destination. 7. I don't want them out of HS stations. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1710	Posted - 2015.01.09 08:14:30 - [52] - Quote Seraph IX Basarab wrote: Then people in station/pos should get ejected out into space if they don't push a button every 20-30 min as well no? No. If you're docked you do not gain anything. Afk mining, afk cloaked in enemy system, etc you do have an advantage, so you have to work for it. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1710	Posted - 2015.01.09 08:46:08 - [53] - Quote Its not perfect and needs work, but I am looking for something to minimize afk cloaking and mining. Any ideas are welcome. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1710	Posted - 2015.01.09 09:06:15 - [54] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: All in all though, Tora's campaign reads like: "make it painful and annoying to play most of the game, except wardecs which should be easier". Care to explain how increased dec fees and social corps make war decs easier ? What would you do if you were head of CCP ? TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1711	Posted - 2015.01.09 10:43:05 - [55] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: Wardec fees are a token change. The problem with wardecs is the mechanics are meaningless, it's just a way to turn off concord. Making it more expensive just for the lowest group doesn't fix the mechanics, and to groups like yours would make very little difference. all that does is mean that a small group wardeccing another small group (the times when the wardec mechanics are arguably working best, because they are actually fighting for a reason rather than killboard padding) has to pay twice as much. So you're saying my suggestions make it harder, not easier ? Marmite has 100+ per week. Let's assume they are all small corps. That would mean I pay 100 x 50M = 5B isks per week more. Would that make me war dec less corps. I would think so. Lucas Kell wrote: I'd personally go the other way. I'd keep it cheap to wardec the first few groups, then it would exponentially grow, so once you read 15 or so wardecs, it becomes ridiculously expensive, and 20 or so would be financially unachievable. Wardecs should happen in far fewer numbers for real reasons, not just so you can switch off concord for the maximum number of targets. You should need to have to make a choice, "do I wardec these guys, or these guys", not "I'll just wardec everyone". Wardecs need to be given more reason. They should be more than just a concord off switch, they should promote interaction between groups who have a reason to fight each other that isn't just the killboard, like fighting with a competitor for example. Effectively what you're doing is saying "I'll sacrifice this really tiny change and you sacrifice this massive change" and acting like it's a fair tradeoff. So you're saying it should be almost impossible for any large mercenary alliance to have more then 20 contracts ? And fun wars should all be removed ? If people are willing to pay for something, why wouldn't you allow it ? If a large null-sec alliance is wiling to pay for SRP, you're saying they can't because it costs to much ? Isn't that their choice ? Did the fact you are at war with us for over a year now, influence your opinion on this matter ? Mercenary alliances go to war for profit, just as null-sec alliances take sov for profit. Are you saying profit is bad and null-sec alliances shouldn't have more then 20 systems or it will get extreemly expensive to hold them ? Lucas Kell wrote: As for social corps, they are just a way to make up for the real change, which is shutting NPC corps to older players. Let's look past the fact that to force someone out of an NPC corp, what really would have to happen is they get dumped in a 1 man corp, and look at the lack of benefit. If a social corp is just effectively an NPC corp, why move them out of an NPC corp at all? NPC corps already have a much more interesting corp chat than most other corps, and keep everyone on the same level. All a social corp would do is force you into the same situation, but with the added restrictions of having to be either alone, a leader of a corp, or overseen by someone else. Not to mention that you suggest they would be restricted to 10 players, so you'd only be able to be social with a very small group of people, and growing bigger would mean turning on wardecs, something NPC players have no interest in doing. I agree NPC corp chats are good for new players, because it's a great place to find out how things in Eve work. But the next step up to a corp is to big in my opinion, as in most cases they do not get the time to settle down. A social corp could be that in between phase. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1713	Posted - 2015.01.09 11:32:09 - [56] - Quote We pay around 10-12B in war dec fees a week. 5B would be about 40% more cost. I would say that's a lot for an alliance who doesnGÇÖt have the luxury of moon goo, afk ratting, etc. Do you think its ok if we would increase your trading taxes with 40% ? Probably not. But still I want this change for war decs, even if it will be hard on my own alliance. So would that make me bad in your opinion or an Eve hero ? Is it bad design if any big null-sec alliance would send in huge fleets to high-sec to come after us ? Is that fair to an alliance as Marmites which is only 170 member ? Are you saying null-sec alliance should have a max number of players to keep things fair ? Or do we just accept that the game you willingly started playing isnGÇÖt always fair and could be evil ? Keep Eve fun and don't nerf it to death. Can you show me your source of GÇ£Yes, sov should be restricted, which is why you'll find most null players in support of occupancy based sov. If you can't use it, you'll lose it.GÇ¥ ? I see you often talk for large groups in Eve, but I keep missing your sources that they really agree with you. Social corps shouldnGÇÖt be boring, as you can grow your corp to about 10 players. I can have a lot of fun with 10 players in Eve. Your view on Eve players being less social in small corps worries me. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1716	Posted - 2015.01.09 12:49:51 - [57] - Quote Then let me rephrase that. Would you think its acceptable to have a 40% less profit ? Of course you wouldnGÇÖt. And are you saying itGÇÖs ok for our clients to pay for these losses ? If so, never start a business. I personally donGÇÖt think its acceptable. IsnGÇÖt that exactly what large null-sec alliances do to smaller alliance when they take over their sov ? You still havenGÇÖt answered the question, what the difference is between us and corps we war dec and big null-sec alliances who go after smaller alliance. I see no difference here. ItGÇÖs all part of the food chain. Exactly the reason I think social corps can be useful. Start a small social corp and continue to grow it to a basic corp or even bigger. Lucas Kell wrote: And of course they would be less social. Why would someone who is currently in an NPC corp choose to put themselves in a group with other players when they gain no benefit from doing so? I really hope you are trolling me here. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1718	Posted - 2015.01.09 13:53:15 - [58] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: Being a CSM member isn't about just pushing what benefits YOU. This is probably the 100th time you keep accusing me I benefit from these changes. And we keep seeing facts its actually the opposite. I am going to end this now and tell myself we just have different views on facts and being social. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1726	Posted - 2015.01.09 21:34:47 - [59] - Quote My focus will still be on high-sec, but why not talk about low-sec http://justforcrits.com/csmx-tora-bushido/ TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1739	Posted - 2015.01.13 08:30:07 - [60] - Quote Your opinions on being able to buy and use security tags in all stations in low-sec ? TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1760	Posted - 2015.01.15 07:45:24 - [61] - Quote Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: I actually think social-corps as a middle ground between NPC and real corps is a horrible idea, and just another carebear-proffed stealth nerf-hisec idea to make those that refuse to put mind in motion yet another mechanism to avoid wars entirely, when they are today already 100% consensual because you can just hide out in said NPC corp... I think it will do exactly the opposite. I want to drag people out of the NPC corp and into a normal corp. It's like when you let someone taste some food for free, hoping they like it so much, they will buy it themselves. So in this case, let them see why a corp can be much more fun then NPC, in the hope they create a normal corp. If they dont, nothing is lost, as they normally would have stayed in the NPC corp anyway. You can only win this way. I do agree on the tax thing. It shouldn't be 0% or it will just be a way to avoid taxes.. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1762	Posted - 2015.01.15 13:18:27 - [62] - Quote Reading some of the other CSM-X candidates posts makes me wonder if I should increase the dark side in my campaign. All I read is nerf, nerf nerf nerf. What happened to all these carebears. HTFU ! TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1799	Posted - 2015.01.16 19:57:52 - [63] - Quote Lokitoki81 wrote: Eve needs content buffs, not nerfs I agree with you. If you read it all, you might even vote for me TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1810	Posted - 2015.01.17 20:18:24 - [64] - Quote Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: YOU SHALL NOT PASS! each time a mechanics change is suggested that decreases non-consensual conflict opportunities in EvE. YOU SHALL NOT PASS ! TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1815	Posted - 2015.01.19 16:00:14 - [65] - Quote Tengu Grib wrote: If you go full darkside you'll get my votes back. I prefered to have a good balanced campaign, but after reading all the other CSM posts (and damn, that took some time ), I decided my campaign needs much more darkness then I expected. Grrr... fluffy campaigns. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1828	Posted - 2015.01.21 08:00:07 - [66] - Quote Vote for Tora, because he really enjoys Eve content and doesn't care about 25 billion isk a month, when it comes to making the right decision. Gevlon, no worries mate. I understand your frustration. It's not easy to deal with people who can't be bought. EDIT : In case you have no idea what this is about : http://www.reddit.com/r/Eve/comments/2t28qr/marmite_fires_gevlon_goblin/ TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1830	Posted - 2015.01.22 07:58:32 - [67] - Quote Feyd Rautha Harkonnen wrote: "If the proposed change to game mechanics is expected to reduce conflict, it should be rejected. If the proposed change will increase conflict, it should be embraced" If you vote for me, you vote for content and conflict......... yes ! TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1832	Posted - 2015.01.22 13:53:21 - [68] - Quote Added my Twitter account to the OP : @blowfish70. Want a fast answer to a question, send a twit. I read it 24/7. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1835	Posted - 2015.01.23 10:13:51 - [69] - Quote I wonder how many players have no idea what the CSM stands for and who never voted before. Any good suggestions how to get in touch with them and make them care ? Would be nice if we could use the in game billboards for this. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1860	Posted - 2015.01.24 11:19:17 - [70] - Quote Resistance is futile ! You shall vote Bushido It's not that you need to force people, as I agree that wont work, but some just didn't really give it much attention. If there is a way to let them know why it's important, they might give it a couple of minutes more.... I hope TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1860	Posted - 2015.01.24 14:46:26 - [71] - Quote Skandel wrote: Any particular twit, Tora? Will Gevlon do? Not ****, Tweet !! TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1863	Posted - 2015.01.25 11:27:46 - [72] - Quote Taris Murkon wrote: If you would stop shitting up other candidates threads it would be a lot easier to vote for for you. I agree with most of your ideas; but dude seriously stand on your own merits and quit trying to knock the the other guys down. You are coming off as a bloody politician. You can call it anyway you like it, but when a I see a post I do not agree with, I will speak up. Would you rather have a CSM member who only agrees with everyone ? TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1863	Posted - 2015.01.25 17:13:59 - [73] - Quote ashurman wrote: Is it not better to give the defenders a reason to fight back? Maybe give them a reason to come out of there stations or log on and fight back. As at the moment there is nothing to actualy make people WANT to fight back vs war decer's/Greifers. Maybe if the defenders win the war they cant get dec'd for a week by anyone else or maybe concord pay the corp all the isk killed. Obv if they have been dec'd by two corps and they win 1 loss 1 they should still get the shield for there win. It saves Big merc allainces/Corps having to have 100's of wars active to get a rookie ship kill on the undock off jita and it actualy makes content rather than something people try to avoid. The reason to fight back is to keep the corp / alliance alive. That alone should be a good reason. If people cant fight themselves, they could hire mercenaries or call in help from friends. What Marmites does isnt any difference then what NPSI fleets do. The biggest difference is, we have to pay a lot of isks for it. ashurman wrote: And maybe a isk reward for the attackers if they win funds you spent on the war get returned or something similer Which can also lead to the cost of wars being increased so Greifers/War dec alliances actualy have to pick targets rather than the dec all button which we see at the moment. Bountys could be payed at a larger % while at war to the attackers as well. Draw's should literaly be no one gets anything and the defenders dont get there shield No isks rewards needed. If it is a paid war dec, they get isks from the client. If it is a fun war, rewards will only make the attacking side richer and we would have even more wars. I can only speak for myself, but sometimes it takes hours to pick targets. Looking at past results, have we decced them recently, do we really need to dec them a 3rd+ time, are they big enough (we prefer 25+ member corps/alliances), etc etc. And yes we do have a lot of wars, then again we also pay for it. If you want a lof of shiny ships, you also pay for it. My point, if people are willing to pay the price, why shouldnt they be able to do it. If for example Code wants to gank with battleships and pay for them, I say let them. Who are we to decide what is good or bad when it comes to people spending their isks ? ashurman wrote: Ok question time: 1 "I would suggest, double the war dec costs for the first group (up to 50 players). and let the rest as it is." By "let the rest as it is" i assume you mean leave it at basic cost but should it not be the other way round? make the first war cheaper and all wars after it more? Would this not mean getting the most out of your isk as you are actualy having to hunt that set allaince/corp rather than sitting on undocks all day as the more groups you dec the more you have to pay so the less isk back in kills you get? 2 Im a bit behind on all the cool kid school yard lingo but what does HTFU mean and why is it so important to you. 3 Cookies or ice cream. And what type. 1. No, by making the first war more expensive, you avoid getting to many smaller corps decced. The bigger corps/alliances should be able to handle a war. The smaller are still in the proces of setting up things (resources, recruitment, etc). 2. HTFU = Harden The **** Up. We have seen so many nerfes in highsec the last two years and no buffs to evilness, it's time we stop this process and even reverse things. If people complain about how hard it is in high-sec now, you should have been here 2 years ago. 3. Ice Cream, Lemon / Red Berries TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1863	Posted - 2015.01.25 18:09:40 - [74] - Quote ashurman wrote: Well not really. War dec's dont kill off corps/alliances. they just dont bother logging in or undocking or they just on play on a alt. when dec ends they can just go back to normal. Surely giving the defenders a reason to fight back which is more than E-honour would give the attackers more content? More than camping undocks and trade routes anyway and just killing off the daft or ignorant. That happens too and in most cases mercs avoid these corps. It is one of the things I look at before we decide to war dec them. But most alliances/corps we war dec do have things to lose. ashurman wrote: And as far as im aware NPSI does not need to wait 24hrs to start shooting people nor does it need to pay anything to do so. Yeh, we might want to nerf that a bit then. It's so unfair to the players they blob. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1863	Posted - 2015.01.25 19:35:37 - [75] - Quote Yes, we would like to win all wars we declare. Are you saying that any other corps/alliance in Eve picks battles so they could lose them ? If that's true, they are doing it wrong. Picking new targets brings the risk of not winning a war, which is way more fun. We sometimes go after targets we know are going to Hurt U (hint hint). Increasing the base price will hurt bigger mercenaries like Marmites, as 150 x 50M extra is a lot of isks we have to work for first. We are not an isks-printer. 80% of our wars are not contracts, so we can not just increase a contract price. Only thing I do agree with you, is that doubling the base price from 50M to 100M could be bad for smaller (merc) corps. Maybe we could only increase it for corps/alliance who have more then an X amount of players ? This way the bigger alliances like Marmites pay more and the smaller (merc) corps (who probably do less damage to a target) pay less. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1865	Posted - 2015.01.25 23:41:10 - [76] - Quote Lucas, if you are telling me I am a liar, then this is the end of our discussion. There is nothing in my replies to you which isn't true. And please stop the industrial, trading comments. I AINT A CAREBEAR ! (caps for drama effects ) TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1865	Posted - 2015.01.26 09:01:15 - [77] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: So it's end of discussion. Yes. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1868	Posted - 2015.01.26 14:24:41 - [78] - Quote * January 30th 2015 GÇô CSM X Candidacy Period opens * February 15th 2015 GÇô CSM X Candidacy Period closes * February 25th 2015 GÇô CSM X Election GÇô Voting opens * March 10th 2015 GÇô CSM X Election GÇô Voting closes * March 21st 2015 GÇô CSM X Results announced during CCP Presents Keynote at Fanfest 2015 TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1887	Posted - 2015.01.30 09:14:30 - [79] - Quote Want more evil in Eve, Vote Bushido ! TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1887	Posted - 2015.01.30 12:34:09 - [80] - Quote Parsimony Kate wrote: Tora Bushido wrote: One of the reasons I think people go AFK while mining, is because itGÇÖs boring to watch the screen while doing so. I want to add a mini game for the miners. What kind, you tell me. ... no kind of mini-game please! Any addition of this sort will get incredibly repetitive and dull extremely quickly. If the objective is to stop miners mining then yes I think a mini-game is a great idea, but if it's to fix the inherent boredom involved in mining then no. Noted. I am open for anything to keep the miners happy enough to don't go afk. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1887	Posted - 2015.01.30 12:35:04 - [81] - Quote Quote: "Application submitted, Thank you for submitting your application for CSM X." Time to bring the evil back in Eve ! TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1890	Posted - 2015.01.30 21:33:50 - [82] - Quote Good question, probably something evil, like 100% tax :). TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1893	Posted - 2015.01.31 00:15:01 - [83] - Quote Let the propaganda begin ! Tell your friends to vote for me or pod them TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1902	Posted - 2015.02.03 10:55:18 - [84] - Quote Thank you Capstable.net TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1905	Posted - 2015.02.04 08:39:19 - [85] - Quote Sol epoch wrote: I advised you about some of your corp having xenophobic comments in Bio's due to you Going for the CSM, Your response was to wardec my 1 man corp and block communications from me with the above comment! "End of discussion and you talk too much". Would you say having a xenophobic tendency or allowing it in your corp/alliance puts you in a good position to be a CSM candidate as a lot of eve players may find that objectionable! You talk to much. CSM posts are not the place to fight for your personal head spins. Have issues with peoples bio, create a petition. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1909	Posted - 2015.02.05 08:29:21 - [86] - Quote In my opinion ganking should be a group thing, which takes effort. Hyperdunking isnt my favorite thing in Eve. But since my campaign is about more evil, I am not against it. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1912	Posted - 2015.02.08 13:47:24 - [87] - Quote Sol epoch wrote: Tora seriously you couldn't recognise evil if it slapped your arse! You change your mind so much I am suprised you even know what day it is. Vote Tora for CSM X if you want no response to questions and no idea why he is there . Damn he doesn't even know why! Your feelings are just hurt, because we kicked your butt in our last wars. Making you cry in a serious CSM post and kicking your butt in a war is evil enough. If you want, I can add a Grrr Sol for you. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1920	Posted - 2015.02.11 15:46:12 - [88] - Quote Mark Eting wrote: Dear Capsulers of HighSec, here i found a nice summary of what Tora Bushido stands for http://www.docdroid.net/rin0/tora-bushido-blackmailer.pdf.html It's a bit of a wall of text, but i think it's quiet interesting...... "Wardec till you do what i want or i make you quit eve" Just a worthless Slogan or something serious? Let's see how the storie continues..... Havent read it all yet, but it looks like great tears. I approve ! TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1923	Posted - 2015.02.11 18:56:02 - [89] - Quote Reaver Glitterstim wrote: I see that you have plenty of excellent ideas for changes to be made. But how would you take control of your seat on the CSM to make these changes? What are your plans for making your vision become a reality? How do you intend to have an influence on the CSM? P.S.: did you write that passage linked above about you being a blackmailer? Come on now, be honest. Its always hard to get your own ideas on the agenda. Best way to do so, is trying to convince the CSM /CCP one by one and let them see why some of the ideas should be added to Eve. But in the end its still CCP's decision. I might be all grrr...war dec everything in game and enjoy being a 'evil guy', but the CSM is hard serious work. If I make it to be a CSM, they'll see a way more serious side of me. That link above is about 50% true and 50% bull ships. Not something I feel like responding to here. Move it to C&P and I might if I have the time. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1943	Posted - 2015.02.13 08:10:02 - [90] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: This year I'm starting to have a look at the running CSM candidates in a bit more depth, and I've written a short review of your campaign, which can be found here. You can write a blog any way you want it to go. ItGÇÖs clear that you and I donGÇÖt like each other. This is affecting your judgement. If I give someone a peace of cake, they would probably say GÇ£Ohh nice, thank you, I love cake!GÇ¥. Someone like you would say GÇ£Ohh Tora is a bad man, he is trying to make me fat!!GÇ¥. If you want to be a good writer Lucas, try to write these things without personal feelings. ItGÇÖs probably the hardest thing to do as a writer. This is one of the things that will make me a good CSM, as I can do this. GÇ£Tora has changed his mind since he started his campaignGÇ¥ vs GÇ£Tora listens to the community and is willing to change if neededGÇ¥ The CSM isnGÇÖt about my ideas, itGÇÖs about the communities ideas. A CSM is there to listen to the voices and express them at the meetings. GÇ£IGÇÖve been quite critical of a few CSM members since the beginning of these campaigns, and Tora is the only one that has gone out of his way to ignore me, even going so far as to block me on twitter from reading his feed.GÇ¥ Looking at how people respond to your forum walls of text, are you sure itGÇÖs just me who wants to ignore you ? Ok, thanks for the effort and Eve content (yes, I really mean that ), but IGÇÖll be going back to ignore Lucas mode. Life short and prosper...... Tora TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1949	Posted - 2015.02.13 20:04:45 - [91] - Quote If I make it to the CSM, I'll promise never to listen to players like Lucas, Veers and Sol. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1950	Posted - 2015.02.13 20:38:43 - [92] - Quote Sol epoch wrote: Tora Bushido wrote: If I make it to the CSM, I'll promise never to listen to players like Lucas, Veers and Sol. Maybe you should be a bit more humble in your approach and not take all that is said as an attack! In the podcast you stated you listened to people and changed your approach, Maybe the one's you are knocking have some good advice you should take on board just like the population you hope to represent? Humble, hahaha I am here for the evil side of Eve, not for the crybabies in game. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1952	Posted - 2015.02.13 23:51:57 - [93] - Quote Sol epoch wrote: And you miss the point again. You know how arrogant that sounds. Think about it TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1957	Posted - 2015.02.14 15:05:42 - [94] - Quote I used to fly in wh space for a few years and I understand they don't have much other options then to be cloaked in space. Sometimes for longer periods to get fleets in the wh's. Then you're not just sitting still without a good reason. In most cases you will be flying around, checking posses, statics etc. Not sure if you'll sit still on grid for longer then 30min much ? TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1957	Posted - 2015.02.14 15:56:30 - [95] - Quote Axloth Okiah wrote: So yeah... while I might sympathise with your desire to deal with AFK miners in hisec, I dare say that ******* over wormholers (and others) in the process isnt the right way to do it. Forcing players to click buttons that dont do anything isnt gonna bring fun to anyone. And people who simply cannot dock because the design of space doesnt allow them to do so, shouldnt be extra penalized for living in already hostile place. Unless you propose ejecting AFK players from stations and POSes. I agree.... TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1959	Posted - 2015.02.14 19:25:07 - [96] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: I suppose that is also just "character assassination" however. In real life we would call you a stalker TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1959	Posted - 2015.02.14 20:22:58 - [97] - Quote http://www.themittani.com/news/csm-x-candidacy-period-ends-sunday Time flies when you re having fun. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1965	Posted - 2015.02.15 01:28:48 - [98] - Quote Sol epoch wrote: If this is fun to you it just shows what a waste of time your attempt at getting to the csm has been Just tell me if you need a hug man. It's ok. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - ADAPT OR DIE - DELETE THE WEAK
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1971	Posted - 2015.02.16 18:24:08 - [99] - Quote Lennox Dantes wrote: Are you my guy? I can give you a very short answer : 100% yes. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1974	Posted - 2015.02.18 09:12:35 - [100] - Quote Some nice ideas about posses : http://evenews24.com/2015/02/17/i-didnt-know-you-had-moved/ TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1982	Posted - 2015.02.19 09:35:54 - [101] - Quote A few days until the voting starts. Seems I have to try harder to be evil http://greedygoblin.blogspot.nl/2015/02/csm-10-recommendations.html TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 1998	Posted - 2015.02.21 20:44:32 - [102] - Quote Jazzmyn wrote: Hello Tora, whats your opinion on Walking in stations and opening that door in the captain quarters? If CCP adds AK47's and the option to shoot the beep out of someone, then kick the corpse out of station and shoot it again. LIKE ! TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2001	Posted - 2015.02.22 01:47:09 - [103] - Quote For those who support me, show/mail/etc your friends one of these links. Tell them what I stand for and hopefully they will support me too. Don't spam locals, chat, etc. with it, as no one likes spam. To Evil for my Shirt ! Pirates have all the fun ! Eve needs more Evil ! TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2002	Posted - 2015.02.22 11:38:30 - [104] - Quote Bellak Hark wrote: Here is your ad. Thanks TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2004	Posted - 2015.02.22 21:08:58 - [105] - Quote Well, you could drop corp and return to high-sec to play with your friends. Or you could train an alt and use that to play in high-sec. Or you could ask your friends to come to NPC null-sec, jump in a wh or go have fun in low-sec. I have the same problems as you have. Always at war and I cant go to null-sec and just cruise around a bit in my Vindicator. Does that make null-sec broken or should I just adapt ? TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2005	Posted - 2015.02.23 08:50:03 - [106] - Quote A few days till the voting starts. \/ Endorsement list : * Bobmon * Xander Phoena * Corebloodbrothers * Corbexx * Sabriz * Manfred Sideous * Sion Kumitomo * Steve Ronuken * Migui XGÇÖhyrrn * Endie von Posts (Random order) TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2012	Posted - 2015.02.25 10:58:54 - [107] - Quote Thanks! And for all of you who dont know who to vote for, see the list above here. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2012	Posted - 2015.02.25 13:54:59 - [108] - Quote Let's do that Fybs. The implant suggestion was already discussed somewhere in the post. And I am on the CFC list. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2015	Posted - 2015.02.25 21:12:31 - [109] - Quote Thanks for all the support mails, chats, etc I am getting. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2018	Posted - 2015.02.26 09:50:44 - [110] - Quote After the 10K+ wars we have had the last 2-3 years, I never expected so much support for my CSM campaign. Good to see many players can see the difference between an Eve role playing evil war lord and a motivated CSM candidate who wants best for Eve. Thanks for all support so far ! TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2019	Posted - 2015.02.26 13:48:50 - [111] - Quote http://show.gamingradio.net/2015/02/25/open-comms-show-25th-feb-2015-this-horse-is-not-dead-yet/ After listening to the "Open Comms Show" I've changed my mind on Multi boxing. I think they're correct to say that there are many other ways people have an advantage on other players (plex, more accounts, websites, etc). Input Duplication and other tools are just one of them. If you want to ban one, you should ban them all. And since I do not want to nerf Eve to death, I rather keep them all. http://www.dual-boxing.com/threads/52023-CSM-10-Canidate-Watch-Who-is-for-and-who-is-against-our-gameplay TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2019	Posted - 2015.02.26 15:52:17 - [112] - Quote Rapscallion Jones wrote: Remove the Faction Police AI completely. If the new player police force guard the gates well they are safe, if they don't chaos ensues. High Sec would have to become its own police force. Sounds fun. If this would be implemented, its something I would join with my own alliance. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2019	Posted - 2015.02.26 17:45:28 - [113] - Quote 100% true. To bad we cant discuss the EULA here TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2020	Posted - 2015.02.26 23:07:08 - [114] - Quote I don't mind guys. The more discussion, the better view we have on the matter. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2020	Posted - 2015.02.27 09:46:12 - [115] - Quote Lucas wrote a nice blog about the above : http://indecisivenoob.blogspot.nl/2015/02/response-to-grn-open-comms-show-25th-feb.html TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2020	Posted - 2015.02.28 00:54:58 - [116] - Quote Thanks ! Save the fedos ! TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2020	Posted - 2015.03.02 00:24:42 - [117] - Quote Dont forget to vote guys.... TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2029	Posted - 2015.03.06 08:17:30 - [118] - Quote Thanks guys. Every vote is needed TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2032	Posted - 2015.03.07 18:12:11 - [119] - Quote Sweet Trader wrote: +2 votes cast Best of luck, Tora. Thank you, founder of Marmites TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2033	Posted - 2015.03.09 12:00:13 - [120] - Quote Tora Bushido wrote: Your opinions on : - Being able to buy and use security tags in all stations in low-sec ? - Being able to store x password for posses, in stead of just 1. - Delayed local (and an upgraded D-scan/radar system to replace local period) in null unless upgrades are in place. Seems delayed local is becoming a thing TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2037	Posted - 2015.03.09 14:59:04 - [121] - Quote I've spend more time in null-sec and low-sec then you would probably guess . But then I need to tell you who my other chars are, which I wont. So I do know how to speak F1 and redeploy. Remember assumptions are the mother of all fckps. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2047	Posted - 2015.03.10 07:46:48 - [122] - Quote Kaarous Aldurald wrote: As history shows us, it's a war whether one side realizes it or not. Something, something, free Tibet? Something, Something, The Volition Cult. I dont think Jenny sees the trouble she is getting her alliance into Something Something #somethingevilnessandfun TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2054	Posted - 2015.03.11 10:53:47 - [123] - Quote So is he saying, because someone can get more enemies, the war mechanics are broken ? That's not very logical mate. As long as he followed orders and voted for me, it's ok TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2058	Posted - 2015.03.11 13:18:50 - [124] - Quote Eve is about sandcastles, Eve isnt safe and high-sec isnt a safe place. HTFU you carebear. It's unfair you can shoot anyone for free in null-sec and we have to pay for it in high-sec. Instead of you wanting to nerf null-sec/etc, you want to nerf the guys who already have to do more hard work and pay mucho iskies to get pvp in high-sec. If you think you re having a hard time in Eve now, you should have been here a few years ago, when life in high-sec was much harder. Many nerfes have been set to high-sec. High-sec is already carebear land. You just want more, because you want it even more easy. Because 'it's not fairrr'......boohoooo..... Now stop this nonsense and tell me you secretly voted for more evil in in Eve ! TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2058	Posted - 2015.03.11 18:30:17 - [125] - Quote We've been a year at war with the entire CFC and probably any other alliance in Eve. We done more then 10K wars total. Are you saying they're all weak ? Of course not and you know this as well. You only say that, because it fits your story. You are as selective with words as Goblin is with numbers. If people want to be in a safe place, let them move to null-sec. What's this CODE koolaid ? Marmites have been shooting people long before Code was a thing. And we're not gankers. So don't mix them up. Yarr, is a very nice expression ... YARR ! Finally something we can agree on, BEER !, to bad I wont be going this year. But I will next year. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2058	Posted - 2015.03.11 19:21:51 - [126] - Quote If wars ever change in high- sec, the first ones to feel the pain are the industrials. Why do you think they sell so many ships now ? Only changes I want to see with the current war system, is a way to protect the smaller corps until they are a bit bigger. So they make more isks to hire mercs or setup their own defences. And for the gankers, I want to see more options for anti-gankers to fight back. But you can read about that in the OP. I do agree that paying 500M/week for a big null-sec alliance is unlogical. They are big and rich enough to defend themselves. The 500M barrier is just protecting them. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2059	Posted - 2015.03.12 07:57:31 - [127] - Quote In the end its all about "Risk versus Profit" and "Attack options versus counter options". If you keep these two in balance, you get great content. And how to do this, well, not everyone agrees on how to do it TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2060	Posted - 2015.03.12 08:46:21 - [128] - Quote Maybe have newbies start in safe null-sec and when they are ready they can try evil high-sec ? TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2063	Posted - 2015.03.12 09:08:32 - [129] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: You problem seems to stem down to you not understanding that EVE is a sandbox and that shooting each other with guns isn't a mandatory activity. Someone who chooses not to shoot someone else should not be at a disadvantage automatically. That's not what EVE is. I understand this. But what you don't seem to understand is that all these fun things in Eve are interactive with each other. Eve doesn't have a little corner somewhere, where you can safely PvE, indy and not care about the PvP side of it. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2064	Posted - 2015.03.12 11:03:09 - [130] - Quote I think we spend way more on CCP war fees, then we get back in loot. Loot fairy hates us. If it was just for the loot, I would stop war deccing people. Have you any idea how much we spend on war dec fees a week ? Its not like ganking where you try to hit high value ships. Your war ideas sound horrible to me. If I wanted to do SOV things, I would have moved full time to null-sec. It would kill the entire meta gaming. It would prevent people to go after the rich incursion players, etc. It would kill the economic war far. We often work for industrials who want us to kill their competition. Did you know there are MANY high-sec alliances who work together with mercenary alliances and who hardly care about wars ? TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2065	Posted - 2015.03.12 11:26:55 - [131] - Quote Your calculations are wrong in so many ways, I'm not even going to explain it to you (hint, Eve, Ships, pods, etc) . Who are you to decide if we re doing things wrong or right ? You know how arrogant this sounds ? I don't care if you don't get it, but at least don't pretend to do so. You're also avoiding all points I made why your systems is terribad. And I kick myself for keep trying to educate you on high-sec wars. I give up....pointless. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2065	Posted - 2015.03.12 11:34:03 - [132] - Quote Ask Gevlon to calculate it. It wont be perfect, but at least much better then most others would do. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2065	Posted - 2015.03.12 11:39:01 - [133] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: Quick and dirty rough calcs, they are just as wrong as your claim that you don't make isk from the loot drops, but they point to the truth. I can guarantee if we did a data pull from zkb and looked at only dropped loot, you'd still be in profit over your war costs. You'll deny it of course because you want to put across this idea that you're hard done by. You don't want your insanely easy playstyle made more difficult, and you'll say anything you can to keep it as it is, even if it your ridiculously laughable claims that you don't make profit. You are far far far worse than any carebear has ever been, because you not only want your playstyle to be easy, but you want it that way at the direct detriment of other people's playstyles. Its not even close to quick and dirty. My rough calculations are based on experience and wallets which go down. Why do you think most Marmites have more then one char ? It's to make isks. Your calculations are based on nothing...... and it shows. Seriously mate, make the calculation..... I dare you. I'll send you a Fedo and a Quafe if you re right. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2065	Posted - 2015.03.12 11:51:34 - [134] - Quote Yes thats what I am saying. We are not in it for the isks. If I wanted isks I would go do incursions, industry, trading, etc. If we were I might even agree with you. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2073	Posted - 2015.03.12 15:03:49 - [135] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: Sometimes I wonder if you're even reading the same forum as the rest of us to come up with the claims you do mate. You do realize, it's just you ? TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2075	Posted - 2015.03.13 07:51:08 - [136] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: CCP are not going to make the types of changes Tora wants. They want to reduce wardecs as they are currently keeping people from forming corps in highsec that aren't purely PvP based which in turn damages player retention. Mass farming of war targets the way current highsec mers do is simply bad for business. Whats the source of your claim ? I read and listen to almost everything in Eve and cant remember seeing it. But maybe there is another good source I didnt know about yet. Quote: HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. So yes, you honestly believe that a Marmite leader having other Marmite players agreeing with him makes him automatically right? That is AMAZING. What's even funnier is in your previous post you even agree with me that the game is unbalanced in favour of wardeccers. I agree, having just corp mates agree with this isnt the most reliable feedback, so I do want opinions from others about it. But that's also true for your replies Lucas. So far, I havent seen anyone agreeing with you too. Maybe less HAHAHA and more short to the point replies ? TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2075	Posted - 2015.03.13 09:05:54 - [137] - Quote You can't just refer to people's blogs who agree with you and tell us its CCP's direction. That's just as bad as me claiming I am right, as Marmite members tell me so. No worries about trolls here, this isnt C&P and the ISD's kill first and then ask questions later in the CSM section. Or use alts. And if thats still not acceptable, mail me. I cant know how people think about Eve issues if they don't tell me first. "Wars prevent large scale non-PvP corporations from being viable" If this is possible in any other part of Eve, why cant you do so in an even more safer part of Eve like high-sec ? So, I don't agree with you here. During a war, only a small part of high-sec can shoot you. In any other space, they can all shoot you. What is more dangerous to be in ? I think the biggest problem is, that high-sec has more newbies in it, that do not know yet how to counter it. When we are at war with non high-sec industrials, for example mining in high-sec, they are very hard to kill. They watch local, are often aligned, use the watch lists, run locater's from time to time and more. Smart playing keeps you alive, not nerfing the game. I don't agree with you that wars are aimless. Like I told you before, wars are also being used to kill the (industrial) competition, deny wh alliances to move through space during wh evictions, deny trade hub use, prevent (ice) miners to clear out entire belts alone and I can give you many more examples. And of course there are also wars for no reasons at all. We sometimes war dec people for flying a Drake. Do you think people in any other part of Eve, kill people because they've good reasons ? Or is Eve always about power, isks, I want yours, I dont like you, die mofo!, etc.... "Wars are aggressor driven". Yes, just as in any part of Eve. So ? Haven't wars always been that way for centuries ? TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2075	Posted - 2015.03.13 09:16:26 - [138] - Quote Tora Bushido wrote: "Wars prevent large scale non-PvP corporations from being viable" If this is possible in any other part of Eve, why cant you do so in an even more safer part of Eve like high-sec ? So, I don't agree with you here. During a war, only a small part of high-sec can shoot you. In any other space, they can all shoot you. What is more dangerous to be in ? I think the biggest problem is, that high-sec has more newbies in it, that do not know yet how to counter it. When we are at war with non high-sec industrials, for example mining in high-sec, they are very hard to kill. They watch local, are often aligned, use the watch lists, run locater's from time to time and more. Smart playing keeps you alive, not nerfing the game. Lol for quoting myself Maybe this is something we can add to the NPE ? Missions where an evil villain appears in their local window and they have to warp off in time. Teach them to counter in stead of nerfing the game. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2083	Posted - 2015.03.13 11:25:28 - [139] - Quote I only wanted dreads to be able to shoot large posses. No other structures. Dreads on small, medium posses, poco's would be way to easy. But right now large posses have it to easy. I don't like nerfes, so I want buffs or new mechanics. Maybe just ignore the entire Dreads thing and give battleships in high-sec +x extra dps if they are hitting a large pos. Or a module, only to be used on battleships in high-sec, which gives you that extra dps when shooting a large pos. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2086	Posted - 2015.03.14 17:33:21 - [140] - Quote Jenshae Chiroptera wrote: Tora Bushido wrote: Lucas Kell wrote: CCP are not going to make the types of changes Tora wants. They want to reduce wardecs as they are currently keeping people from forming corps in highsec that aren't purely PvP based which in turn damages player retention. Mass farming of war targets the way current highsec mers do is simply bad for business. Whats the source of your claim ? I read and listen to almost everything in Eve and cant remember seeing it. But maybe there is another good source I didnt know about yet. CCP plan to implement "social corporations" that you can not declare war on. Good. This is also part of my own campaign (see OP). Gives small corps the option to grow first. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2090	Posted - 2015.03.17 11:03:09 - [141] - Quote Quote: Social Corp/ NPC You shouldn't be able to stay longer then 2-3 months in a NPC corp. Players should be able to create small social corps with max 10 players in it, which canGÇÖt be war decced (can still be ganked). But they also canGÇÖt own a pos, poco or future structure and they canGÇÖt war dec someone else. This might look bad, as they can freely do anything they want, but if you look at it more closely, they can still do the same things as they could do in an NPC corp. Only this way they have the chance to build up a corp. See it as a stage between NPC and a corp. The social corps do need to pay an X amount of tax or it will just become another tax/war avoiding corp. If 10 is the correct number.... needs further study. TORA FOR CSM X - A NEW HIGH-SEC YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2178	Posted - 2015.03.27 15:36:08 - [142] - Quote Round beginning - 75 candidates remain 36983 votes, 12328 quota Initial talley: 4483 "Sion Kumitomo" 2388 "Sugar Kyle" 2078 "corebloodbrothers" 1903 "corbexx" 1805 "Chance Ravinne" 1519 "Cagali Cagali" 1354 "Manfred Sideous" 1343 "Sort Dragon" 1276 "Gorga" 1217 "Steve Ronuken" 1195 "Mike Azariah" 1099 "UAxDEATH" 928 "Migui X'hyrrn" 890 "Jayne Fillon" 798 "Thoric Frosthammer" 724 "Lorelei Ierendi" 712 "Xenuria" 686 "Bam Stroker" 643 "Tora Bushido" 593 "Gorski Car" 478 "Ashterothi" 477 "Bobmon" 454 "June Ting" 441 "Endie" 429 "Vaari" 413 "Citricioni" 404 "Khador Vess" 397 "Erika Mizune" 355 "Sabriz Adoudel" 329 "Alyxportur" 306 "Xander Phoena" 285 "NSA Bivas" 281 "Angrod Losshelin" 266 "Ariete" 263 "Aeon Boirelle" 244 "PsychoBitch" 188 "Janwa Resh" 183 "Purinpu" 173 "Vic Jefferson" 171 "Psianh Auvyander" 157 "Borat Guereen" 155 "Klapen" 143 "Lyonic" 142 "Soelent" 131 "Leelo dallasmultipas" 127 "Harry Saq" 122 "Jenshae Chiroptera" 116 "Kasken" 116 "Cycule" 109 "DomanarK" 106 "Suzy RC Mudstone" 104 "Radu Lupescu" 101 "Nervon" 94 "Ryan Farmern" 91 "Decimat Draconia" 89 "Crante" 86 "My name isJeff" 80 "Harek" 73 "Bane Cortex" 67 "Malis Caretia" 66 "Roban Crause" 63 "Dadrom" 61 "Erweb Maken" 58 "KaziKai" 57 "Aradus Gunnell" 43 "Miralissa Issa" 42 "Aiwha" 38 "CatanaFleet Red" 36 "commander aze" 31 "Bait'er De'Outlier" 28 "Michael Laloush" 26 "Soul Crusher" 26 "Perosteck Neuchatel" 16 "Justin Amalastoner" 12 "Raiealatar" YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2189	Posted - 2015.04.01 14:29:43 - [143] - Quote Noragen Neirfallas wrote: Pretty damed good imo Yeh not bad at all. Going for CSM XI next year. YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2191	Posted - 2015.04.02 08:27:48 - [144] - Quote Lol, its him again...... Marmite Fan boys, got to love them. YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !
Tora Bushido EVE Corporation 987654321-POP The Marmite Collective 2191	Posted - 2015.04.02 11:08:26 - [145] - Quote Lucas Kell wrote: Tora Bushido wrote: Lol, its him again...... Marmite Fan boys, got to love them. I'll take that to mean that no, it'll still be a joke campaign. Thanks. And again, lol.... he must love me long time. YOU EITHER LOVE US OR WE HATE YOU - DELETE THE WEAK , ADAPT OR DIE !

COPYRIGHT NOTICE
EVE Online, the EVE logo, EVE and all associated logos and designs are the intellectual property of CCP hf. All artwork, screenshots, characters, vehicles, storylines, world facts or other recognizable features of the intellectual property relating to these trademarks are likewise the intellectual property of CCP hf. EVE Online and the EVE logo are the registered trademarks of CCP hf. All rights are reserved worldwide. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. CCP hf. has granted permission to EVE-Search.com to use EVE Online and all associated logos and designs for promotional and information purposes on its website but does not endorse, and is not in any way affiliated with, EVE-Search.com. CCP is in no way responsible for the content on or functioning of this website, nor can it be liable for any damage arising from the use of this website.